Archive for the ‘Tax Exempts’ Category

Build America Bonds: A Looking Glass On The Tax Extenders Bill

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

The future of The American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act of 2010 (H.R  4213- a/k/a the “tax extenders bill”) remains highly uncertain.  Even so, an examination of the arguments for and against the bill’s provisions is a valuable exercise.  Many of these conflicting arguments are reflected in the wider debate over how to promote economic recovery while also assuring no recurrence of the world-wide financial crisis. 

Questions such as: Which monetary policies and investment structures to use? How they should be put into place, and what specific goals should be achieved?  animate the debate. Nevertheless, there is near universal agreement on the objective of re-establishing economic strength and stability while not rewarding the parties viewed as responsible (in whole or in part) for causing the economic collapse.  These contrasting positions exist in a microcosm in the debate over the The Build America Bonds program.

Some argue in favour of continuing and expanding a program that has successfully created government and government contracting jobs at a low cost and in a reasonable time-frame.  The Obama Administration cites a rise in state and local infrastructure development and job creation as being the direct results of the access to low cost financing that the bonds make possible for these governments

Because these benefits are being delivered via a direct subsidy and not through a third party, others contend that 1) the cost savings to issuers is greater than the cost of the program to the federal government and 2) tax compliance is higher for those benefiting from the subsidies:

An additional claim is that the program’s expansion of the taxable bond market serves to lower the pressure on the traditional municipal bond market and, thus, lowers interest costs for issuers of those securities

Opponents argue that the Build America Bonds Program, while portrayed as tax relief, is, in reality, a tremendous government spending program that imposes upon taxpayers nationwide the costs of excessive underwriting fees paid to the original instigators of the economic distress: Wall Street banks.   In addition, they argue that the subsidy provided to state and local governments is unnecessarily generous, and that it encourages excessive borrowing that could further impair state finances. Excessive borrowing by another major player in the U.S. economy, homeowners, played a major role in fueling the current crisis.

These positions are well represented in statements that Sen. Charles Grassley (R. IA) has made about the Bond program specificly and about the Tax Extenders Bill in general.

As the tax-writing committees struggle to develop tax policies that will create jobs in the near-term future while avoiding the mistakes of the recent past, debates like this one are likely to continue.

Treasury Nominee Mundaca Appears Before Finance

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

The Senate Finance Committee held a hearing today on the President’s nominee, Michael Mundaca, to be Treasury Assistant Secretary for Tax Policy. 

Mundaca agreed with Senator Wyden that the approach of the “86 Tax Reform Act – – broadening the base and lowering tax rates – – would be a “good model going forward” for tax reform.   He said the tax system should be fair, simple, and easy to administer, while raising the required amount of revenue.

Responding to questioning from Chairman Baucus, he said that non-compliance is an implicit tax increase on compliant taxpayers and that he would continue to work on proposals to increase information reporting to close the tax gap. 

He also announced that the Administration is likely to support extension of the Build America Bond program beyond 2010.  According to new figures that Mundaca released at the hearing, state and local governments have issued more than $47 billion in BABs.